1. Home
  2.  / New Answer To Tenure Security

New Answer To Tenure Security

Rather than forcing everyone into tenancy option that doesn’t meet the needs of all tenants and landlords, there is a better way, writes Andrew King.

By: Andrew King

1 November 2018

By the time you read this all submissions on the Residential Tenancies Act Review and the Healthy Homes Guarantee Bill standards will have closed.

From speaking to tenant advocates it’s clear we come from two very different viewpoints. It appears that some of the more vocal advocates are extreme and onesided in their thoughts, with an unrealistic expectation for the outcomes of their proposals. This is a shame as the NZPIF has always tried to form policy by considering the needs of tenants as well as the needs of rental property providers. Other tenant advocates have also approached changes to our industry in a similar manner and I firmly believe that leads to better outcomes.

Group Short-Sited

While many of us agree that a rental property should be a tenant’s home, an increasing number of tenant groups come from the position that this means having all the rights of a home owner with none of the costs, risks or responsibilities involved in owning a property.

These groups claim that the rental system is broken because tenants do not have all the rights of a home owner. This is unbalanced and totally unrealistic.

Coming from this viewpoint, they believe it is fair that a tenant can give three weeks’ notice to end their tenancy, but they can stay in the property as long as they like. In their view a landlord should not be able to provide a 90-day notice to a tenant so they can sell a property with vacant position. More than this, they believe an owner can only sell their rental property to another investor who must take on the tenant whether they want to or not.

‘A new purposebuilt tenancy option would provide the real security that some tenants genuinely want’

Such a rule would restrict the number of people who could buy the property by around two thirds, and then further restrict buyers to those who want to take on your existing tenant. It is incredible to think that anyone can think in such an unbalanced and unfair way, and we can just hope that our Government can see through this poorly thought out proposal.

There are many rental property providers who would welcome a tenant who wants to stay for a very long time in their property. It is already happening through our existing tenancy system, with many tenancies being 20 years or more in length. Rather than forcing everyone into one restrictive and heavily regulated tenancy option that doesn’t meet the needs of all the various tenants and landlords that make up our industry, there is a better way.

A New Tenancy Option

The NZPIF has submitted that a third tenancy option be established in a balanced way to meet the needs of both landlords’ and tenants who would like to provide and receive such a long-term tenancy. Such a tenancy could see owners provide real security for tenants by committing to not selling or moving into their rental property, thereby giving real security for their tenants.

It must be acknowledged, however, that this involves the owner giving up some of their property rights and they should be compensated in some way to provide balance. Either the tenant will need to make concessions or there needs to be an incentive for the owner.

A new purpose-built tenancy option would provide the real security that some tenants genuinely want and match it with owners able to provide it. It would allow tenants that value a periodic or fixed term tenancy to still have this option. Honest communication and a balanced, realistic approach is a better solution than stamping your foot and saying I want it all my way.


Related Articles